A UMass study on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is thought to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is definitely an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two big resort gambling enterprises in the next few years.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.
The analysis, which comes through the educational school of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That is sufficient in order to make it the gambling study that is largest ever completed in the United States.
Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies
The study ended up being praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who said so it should provide an objective way to understand the way the state has been influenced by gambling going forward.
‘The most important point is that we are establishing standard conditions for every socio and economic variable that might be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our scientists will then track alterations in those variables throughout the entire life of the casinos in order to know up to a certainty the consequences and to inform mitigation that is data-driven for any potential negative consequences.’
The study was conducted between 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire september.
The result was a wealth of information detailing precisely how people in Massachusetts gamble and view various forms of gaming.
As an example, it turns out that about 72 per cent of respondents reported gambling at least onetime within the past year.
Many Massachusetts residents (about 60 percent) said they played the lottery, while 22 percent reported that they’d gone to a casino during the previous year.
Residents Like Casinos, But Not Locally
One topic that is hot the location has been how Massachusetts’ brand new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are straight to worry: 65 percent of those Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion that should go way down when the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also investigated exactly how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or more to three full-scale casinos. The answer was the one that has been heard in many communities throughout the continuing state: not in my backyard.
A very good 59 percent most of adults in Massachusetts said they think gambling expansion will either have impact that is neutral be advantageous to the state.
But, 46 percent think that gambling expansion would be harmful in their own community, while only 28 % trust casino expansion would be beneficial locally.
The research also found that illegal gambling was fairly typical in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports in the year that is past while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated online gaming internet sites.
More in-depth analysis associated with the data collected is expected to be released within the months in the future. However, major detective Rachel Volberg claims that the actual value in this study ended up being collecting information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize just how unusual it’s for the problem gambling study to be completed before some new kind of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg stated. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission so clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’
Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) after which Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now concluded that FIFA does not share the essential values of the police force community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to fund a joint program that is anti-match-fixing.
The integrity that is 10-year Sport initiative was made to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal gambling syndicates, but Interpol stated this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol is still committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, i’ve determined to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All external lovers, whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and axioms of the company, also as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions associated with deal, signed in 2011, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible with the maxims, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following arrest of seven FIFA officials as the result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer regulating human anatomy has not held up its end of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why ended up being Interpol, along with its wide-reaching access to an expansive network of police force agencies, unaware of FIFA corruption in 2011?
The British press was crying foul as far right back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The World that is secret of: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. It is said by the name all.
Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC affairs that are current, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter was being investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.
The former chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’ in it, Lord Triesman,
A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he don’t.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its head in the sand was more concerning the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the law that is international agency constituted more than 25 % of its annual budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the US, the only nation that dared to contain the organization to task, it had been too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
For a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it is a zinger!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a vehicle,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But who is driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The authorities,’ he zinged.
Fleetingly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had selected to ‘relinquish his office.’
Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million check that is dud when Ritz staff attempted to cash it the day after his gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
In accordance with the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury wrote out the check to finance a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it ended up being a dud if the casino tried to bank it the following morning.
The Ritz normally searching for an£ that is extra ($310,000) in accumulated interest on your debt.
It’s been reported that the casino, which can be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a group of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively in the courts.
In line with the London Evening Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the last year alone in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s protection is which he is a gambling addict and his staff should have known this and stopped him from playing.
He wants the debts written off, but he is on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won a similar High Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife of this Omani minister that is foreign.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had checked out the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a few hours. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her debt. She quickly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantageous asset of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her casino-online-australia.net to continue playing a game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made alert to her gambling addiction, and even allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.
She also said that the casino had been under a ‘duty of care’ it had failed to fulfill towards her, a responsibility which.
But, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her see towards the Ritz.
In governing in favor of the casino, the judge said he was certain that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to hold in gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would have already been eager and likely to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and really most likely during her stay in London during the days or weeks after 3 April 2012.’
The judge in the Al Geabury case, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a initial hearing that psychiatric reports have been commissioned to evaluate Al Geabury’s state of head in the day he lost the money and whether he had been in charge of their actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury has a gambling addiction therefore the claimant’s understanding of that,’ she said.